If we invaded Canada based on false info, then decided to withdraw, would that be ';cutting and running';?

Yes, if we were rebuilding Canadian government, economic, and infrastuctures. Nice try, but apples and oranges dude. How about this.....at the end of WW2 we occupied Japan into the 50's!





Read a history book.If we invaded Canada based on false info, then decided to withdraw, would that be ';cutting and running';?
It was false info Iraq was a threat to U.S. interests and security? Study world affairs more!If we invaded Canada based on false info, then decided to withdraw, would that be ';cutting and running';?
It would be against international law, immoral, and those who instigated it should be tried for war crimes.

white hair

If a line cuts two sides of a triangle proportionally, then it is parallel to the third side, ture or false?

false.. if you draw it out it makes senseIf a line cuts two sides of a triangle proportionally, then it is parallel to the third side, ture or false?
false

True or False: A raw onion rubbed on cuts will act as an antiseptic..?

Talse.





Idk. True?True or False: A raw onion rubbed on cuts will act as an antiseptic..?
Try it and see.


But dont blame me if it gets infected.True or False: A raw onion rubbed on cuts will act as an antiseptic..?
i hear it works on scars, but it might burn a cut or open wound
I've heard it works on mosquito bites.

True or false? Men are better than women at cutting men's hair.?

I am a 31 year old man and I have found that men are very good at cutting men's hair. Although I will say this. Every once in a while I will come across a female hairstylist that is simply excellent at cutting a man's hair.True or false? Men are better than women at cutting men's hair.?
I work in a hairdressers and the women are better than the men, the men don't listen. But maybe thats just where I work!True or false? Men are better than women at cutting men's hair.?
False-Women are better because they know what they like on a man and what you look good with to attract a woman.
true , they know how to cut hair from evey angle.
Im currently in cosmetology school and I have noticed that everyone flocks to the guys... I don't know why either. I work for Paul Mitchell and I will tell you that most of the corporation is made up of amazing male hairdressers. Most incredible artist that come to mind first are males as well... Interesting how that works.
True. My husband gets his hair cut by his mom, she's a hairdresser and owns her own salon. A few times his step-dad has cut his hair and he's done a much better job than when his mom cuts it.





And it's not just my husband. I notice this with other guys that go in for haircuts as well. I'm very in-tune to people's surroundings, and not to be the evil daugther-in-law, but his mom is usually a little sloppy with things, like the front desk where you pay, the way she folds towels....His step-dad is usually more tidy and thorough when it comes to cleaning up and folding towels and I notice the same aspects when they both cut hair as well. But it's different for every hairdresser. If you notice one stylist has a cleaner station than another...you may want to switch to the tidier stylist next time.
I,ll say for the most part true I,m a barber and I find more men rather have a male barber as temping as it maybe to have a sexy female doing it you still have to walk out in public with the results and know guy wants to be hit just cause he let a female rub her boobs on his head the male barber is uselly your best choice ....


and thats not just cause I cut hair I ,ve seen it with my own two eyes .
I truly believe that it is completely upon the stylist and their abilities. I don't think that being a man, or woman has anything to do with it. Its all about if there good or not. But if you do find a good one I would keep them! LoL. Good stylist are hard to find! Good luck!

Whirlpoll cutting 1100 jobs. Should they be reported to flag@wh for helping spread false information?

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/whirlpo鈥?/a>Whirlpoll cutting 1100 jobs. Should they be reported to flag@wh for helping spread false information?
As usual Liberal AssLicker you are wrong. The last 8 years of failed policy really hurt this country, ';like most manufacturers (Whirlpool), has seen its sales slump over the past year as a global economic recession and housing market slump hurt demand for home appliances.';











Oh and by the way, it's Whirlpool not Whirlpoll.Whirlpoll cutting 1100 jobs. Should they be reported to flag@wh for helping spread false information?
A invented crisis, the economy. Obama done what he did to intentionally cause massive unemployment. Obama and his Administrations logo is : Never let a good crisis go to waste, even if you have to invent one. The economy has always recovered, by itself. Obama has not done sh*t. Sorry, but I do not report anyone one to Obama's snitch site, cause he is the enemy and I will not help him corrupt people.
The economy is recovering. Just not in the areas you are quoting. I guess we could pick a few points out. I would point to the economy as a whole, but you are just interested in the problem, I have never heard ONE solution from your, or a real question. The link you posted is trifling at best and maybe innacurate, but the website stuff is hilarious.


You were saying the same thing when I had like 450 points. lol
LIBERAL A%26amp;%26amp;KISSER: Obama has a way to go.





1 MILLION jobs lost in 2 months in 2008.
2.6 million lost in 2008
You should report Obama for saying Caterpillar will soon be hiring back laid off workers.

If money grew like trees we would all be poor because of clear cutting true or false?

If money grew on trees, people would not need to cut down trees to make money. Therefore there would be trees and we would all be rich. Until there was an abundance of money and inflation caused prices to go up, and then we'd all become poor.If money grew like trees we would all be poor because of clear cutting true or false?
If money grew on trees, Amerenue wouldn't be taking so long to trim my tree branches that are hanging over power lines.If money grew like trees we would all be poor because of clear cutting true or false?
Potentially false, if everyone planted a billion trees for themselves.
False theree are more trees now than ther were 40 years ago.
False, because you did not include the trees we can keep on our property. I'd be able to live pretty nicely.
true
False. When an area gets clear cut, guess what happens? Yep! More trees start growing.





Trees are a renewable resource. the only way trees aren't going to grow back is because something was built to prevent it - a parking lot, a factory, YOUR HOUSE.......
If we all had all the money we wanted and you had a ham sandwich, would you sell it?
... My God you need a hobby, brah. I'm just guessing here, your a liberal... ??

POLL: True Or False: Captain Crunch Cuts The Roof Of Your Mouth?

true. same with doritos. but they're too goodPOLL: True Or False: Captain Crunch Cuts The Roof Of Your Mouth?
I love it, but yeah it does hurt the top of your mouth.POLL: True Or False: Captain Crunch Cuts The Roof Of Your Mouth?
True. As do coco puffs.
True!


hurts big time!
very true
true.. and it hurts..
True..
True for some people but False for me
True but i still love it!
false i guess its never cut the roof of my mouth that i know of
it does and it hurts but it tastes so good





*drools*
false
so true....
false
false
YES!
never had it,I like cheerios
i have not had it since i was 7

white hair

True or False: Tax cuts increase GDP and improve the Balance of Trade. (Explain)?

It is an axiom in the neoliberal textbook.





As it is true with many basic truths in economy, they were formed when capital was scarce. Let me explain:





Once upon a time the limiting factor for the growth of economy was availability of capital for investments. Capital, that is, industrial capuital has the following structure:





Fixed capital (that is the money locked in property, buildings and machinery)


Variable capital (The part invested in raw materials, working force and other operative costs)


Profit





As the fixed capital is unreachable without selling the factory and the variable part is necessary to resume production, the only part available for investmens is profiit. But many predators scavenge on profit.





The owner must live on it (and his tastes can be quite expensive)


Some of the taxes have already been incorporated in the cost of work, but many are burdening profit. In fact the state is the main rival to the owner around the question how to invest profit.





So you can see, basically, the lower the taxes are, the higher the growth of economy.





But there comes a catch: This only works on the premises that the owner will invest money rationally and that the investments that bring the biggest benefit to the community will also be the most profitable.





Both these premises are wrong. The owner may not invest rationally, he may invest greedily. This happens when somebody invests in something that brings big short-term profits and a lot of long-term damage left to others to deal with.





And it is clearly visible that often the most profitable investments are the ones that do the most harm (i.e. war technology and drugs).





That is why the neoliberalist assumptions, although basically correct and sound, don't always hold water in modern society.





The situation today is still worse because there is a surplus of capital that is constantly seeking the greatest profits. Thus states must decrease taxes and other costs to big capital and offer other bonuses as downcuts of workers rights, just to prevent the capital from fleeing their country. Basically, this is not a free market anymore, this is a blackmail. And the neoliberal claim that lower taxes make greater economical growth is one of the main threats in this game of blackmailing.

Cutting dyed hair truth or false?

I recently dyed my hair a dark burgandy.


and i want to cut my hair (a small trim)





i heard that if you have highlights and cut even a bit of your hair, the highlights will disappear.


so i wanted to know if dyed hair will also disappear when i cut it.Cutting dyed hair truth or false?
that is completely false. dye dyes your hair (hence the name) and cutting your hair will not affect it at all. what you may have heard is that if you begin to grow out your dyed hair and the top half of your hair is natural and the bottom half is dyed then you can cut of the dyed bits and make your hair natural again, but that is completely logical. i hope this makes sense!Cutting dyed hair truth or false?
NOPE false
no!!!! dnt be stupid, dye stays on your hair but if you cut from the top of the highlights only then will they disappear, you will be fine with a small trim
No of course not. I've cut my colored hair many times.
no, that's silly
no..how could hair dye just magically disappear?
that's 110% false :]





it's just that when your hair starts to grow your roots will grow and.. yeah =P
That is completely false, whoever said that is ignorant
no don't worry about it thats totally not true cause i do it all the time.

True or false: Voting Republican would be like slowly cutting your own throat open with a dull saw ?

True, in the figurative sense though.True or false: Voting Republican would be like slowly cutting your own throat open with a dull saw ?
correction---18 false's, one false actually made since so I gave Face thumbs up

Report Abuse

True or false: Voting Republican would be like slowly cutting your own throat open with a dull saw ?
another correction---13 thumbs down, but still 17 false's

Report Abuse

That's not a bad comparison, but I think voting Republican again after what we've had the last 8 years, knowing that McCain and Bush's policies are pretty much the same, would be more like regressing back to infancy.
Come on..what a horrible thought..are you DEMS getting desperate or what? What ever happened to talking about the facts? What happened to the truth? Using the race card would be better than using junk thoughts like this!
True.





Vote democrat and it'll be like using a guillotine.





Vote Bob Barr and we'll get the wounds we already have stitched up.
true, but when the voting decision is only about the grade of the blade you will be using it doesn't really matter that much
True!





Voting Democrat would be going straight for the jugular vein and being dead in minutes.
False, these scare tactics are getting pathetic.
You've got the wrong party. Hussein Obama is the Muslim.
False, that analogy fits Obama to a T.
False, I'm not republican but I'd rather vote for one than cut my throat open with a dull saw.
False.
False
False
False, a Republican unlike a Democrat is too smart to cut his own throat! LOL
true
false
Oh please, give it a rest! How old are you like 10?
False, my dear.
I watch FREE SPEECH TV this morning, according to that show it is like you vote for NAZY in last century.
Just more proof that the best cannot be imitated. Very poor attempt. tsk tsk
Go hug a tree. It what your best at isnt it?
its true that voting for any republican or Democrat is selling America's future to the Chinese





Register your discontent.


Vote Third Party.


Hit the politicians where it counts - at the ballot box.





';Some men change their party for the sake of their principles; others their principles for the sake of their party.';


- Winston Churchill





http://www.the13thstory.com/krg/words/my鈥?/a>
100% true! Do yourselves a favor and stop voting for these failing republican policies that clearly SUCK.
Absolutely True.





Friends don't let friends vote Repuglican.
True - voting Republican is voting against your interests.
true
False, but listening to your gibberish is worse than a kick in the shins!
true, very true
True.
True! How can it NOT be?
Not if you vote for Ron Paul

True or False?? The ANTI-WAR movement is a FAILURE!..the Democrats won't cut the funding!?

Why not?...many called the war a ';failure'; before it even began! The anti-war movement's an even BIGGER failure by that logic!True or False?? The ANTI-WAR movement is a FAILURE!..the Democrats won't cut the funding!?
True. It was a failure in the revolutionary war, war of 1812, Civil War, Spanish American war, World War 1, World War 2, Operation Desert Storm, Operation Desert Fox, Operation Enduring Freedom (Afgahnistan), and Operation Iraqi Freedom. It has only been succesful in Korea, and Vietnam, but we all know what happens when you don't fight to win a war.True or False?? The ANTI-WAR movement is a FAILURE!..the Democrats won't cut the funding!?
False.
The war is a failure.......so is the anti-war movement.





Sooner or later someone has to get something right....let's hope its sooner.
Wait till September, when the Republicans start to leave Bush's side and Congress can override Bush's veto....cutting off funding is a good way to start a humanitarian disaster...I want the war to end too, but we need to be smart about it and do it with the least bloodshed.
I am a conservative who supports the war, but I don't know if the declining Anti-War movement is a failure or just a result of the Presidential election cycle beginning. I think a lot of liberals are now abandoning their efforts to end the war right now so that they may spend their time and resources electing a canditate who they know will absolutely end the war once elected.
true
the anti-war failure makes the democrats look like wussies.....





the war failure is killing our troops.......





what failure do you prefer????





not a hard one is it??? you can't compare oranges to apples and expect a cogent argument!!!!!!





and if you don't think the war in Iraq is a failure..... perhaps you need a dose of reality!!!!!!

True or False: HILLARY and OBAMA would take away the ';Bush TAX CUT'; for those making less than .25 million

Another wat to phrase it:





IF YOU MAKE LESS THAN 250K/YEAR THE PLANS SUBMITTED BY HILLARY AND OBAMA WOULD RAISE YOUR TAXES, TRUE OR FALSE?True or False: HILLARY and OBAMA would take away the ';Bush TAX CUT'; for those making less than .25 million
False - Hillary is allowing the tax cuts to expire for those OVER 250k - not those under.True or False: HILLARY and OBAMA would take away the ';Bush TAX CUT'; for those making less than .25 million
You need to read that plan again.
In the longer run--False.
True
true





both Hillary and Obama support allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire for everyone -- rich, poor, and middle class.





The Bush tax cuts eliminated all income taxes for millions of poorer tax filers -- some of whom became eligible to receive money back in the form of refundable credits when they'd previously been paying taxes.





***


it seems that both Obama and Hillary need the added revenue in order to pay for their health care for everyone plans.
TRUE!! She and he have already said that they repeal them immediately.





Romney will make them permanent.
Absolutely, there hasn't been two tax and spend liberals like these two running for office since LBJ. They would take the ';Great Society'; and take it up another level with socialized medicine for all.





In theory, I would love to cover everyone, but in practice it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Just ask the doctors bailing out of the British system right now and going to private insurance only.





Also, read this link, if you are thinking about voting for Hillary.





http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/?page_id=…
false





republicans are bad people.





They eat puppies for fun.
So it's not OK to discriminate based on skin color or gender, but it is OK to discriminate based on income?


Here's an idea: since we are all equally citizens, shouldn't the government treat us equally, regardless of income? I didn't know ';rich'; people were 2nd class citizens and that it was OK to treat them differently.


What's with all the bigotry and class warfare? What difference does it make if I make $1 per year, or $1,000,000 per year? I'm still an American and deserve to be treated the same as everyone else.





And yes, if any of the Socialists (Hillary and Obama) get elected, it's bad for all of us. After all, if the people making over $250K (the people that own businesses) have higher costs (taxes), they will raise prices, so the higher taxes just get passed on to the consumers (people making less than $250K). Surprisingly, some of us actually managed to stay awake in Economics 101.
I have only heard them say they want to repeal the Bush tax cuts. I havent either of them specify that only some of the tax cuts would be repealed under their proposed plans.


All tax payers got tax cuts under the Bush administration. So it would up the taxes for anyone who paid taxes if the tax cuts were repealed across the board.





I made about 47k last year and my tax liability is over 1300 dollars less than it would be under the tax structure of 2000 pre Bush tax cut plan.





And there is not currently a tax bracket change at 250k, its at 350k is where the top tax bracket starts.
True, but if elected, they are going to raise every one's taxes, and they will protect their corporate buddies and lobbyist.


The economy is in a downturn right now with some saying we are headed for or in a recession and others saying that things will be better by the third quarter of the year. The White House and Congress have drafted a plan to stimulate the economy, a package that has rare bipartisan support. The problem with the package is that it is a redistribution of wealth.





The plan calls for rebate checks for people who did not earn enough money to pay income taxes and caps the rebates at income levels of $75,000 for single taxpayers and $150,000 for married taxpayers. The rebates completely phase out at $87,000 and $174,000 respectively. The word rebate in this plan is misleading because a rebate is the return of something a person has paid. When one buys a camera with a rebate then part of what the person paid is sent back. If the economic plan were applied to the business world then one person would buy the camera and the company would send the rebate to a person who did not buy one.





The Democrats are not completely on board with the plan because it does not include more benefits (such as unemployment) along with the redistribution of wealth from those who pay the taxes to those who do not. In other words, they like it but feel it has enough socialism built into it.





The government likes this plan because it will put money in the hands of people who are likely to spend it. If they gave the money back to the people who actually paid it then about 70% would be invested. Instead, the money will go to those who will run right out and spend it instead of putting some of it away for the future. The plan is short term as well as short sighted and since the government is slow with these kinds of things the money is likely to hit people’s hands about the time the economy starts to get better (depending on what economists one listens to). Additionally, this plan will do absolutely nothing to fix the part of the economy that is causing most of the problems, the housing crunch.





I know one thing that can end with this so called rebate and that is the mantra that our tax policies only help the rich. In this case, the rich are sending their money to the poor. There are some who will say that we are borrowing the money (which increases the deficit) so it is not coming from the rich. In reality, the government will have to get the money from some place and that place is from those who pay taxes.





If we want to stimulate the economy how about we cut taxes across the board so people will have more of their income to spend? How about we make other countries pay tariffs on the items they export to our country. How about we force our elected leaders to limit spending and force them to balance the budget? How about we force them to stop adding pork to bills and end the earmark practice? We could start drilling for our own oil and drive the costs down?





Of course these things are unlikely to happen because our elected officials are short sighted. The only reason they came up with this plan is because it is an election year and they all want to be able to say they helped the poor. While they like to pretend there are enough rich to tax into oblivion, they realize that the middle class and poor make up the lion’s share of our population. They will have far more votes than those who will foot the bill.





Socialism is the way of the left and they will certainly expand upon it should a Democrat be elected to the White House and the Republicans are so fragmented they are going along with it.





Yes, the “rebate” is socialism and pandering for votes.
False, if you make more than 250,000 if will be taken away.


That is not very many people.
TRUE, she will raise all taxes to fund the';ideas that America can not afford';.
True, I make far less than $250K and have benefited greatly by the tax cuts. There are numerous tax cuts due to expire in 2010, including some of the tax benefits of Coverdell and 529 savings plans. This is just a small example of some of the cuts that benefits those of us who make less than .25mil.
i could careless we make double that amount
False
Make no mistake, if the democrats get elected, and they will, taxes will go up. Why can't we be socially and globally minded and at the same time fiscally responsible. Can we merge parts of both parties? Trust me, taxes will be raised.

Why do some here bear false witness against their Wiccan neighbors with those standard cut & paste answers?

Every question asked about Witches or Wiccans, a couple of members (who might be the same person), without actually answering the question, put up a standard cut %26amp; paste ';warning'; that is probably plagerized from some Christian site.





What's sad is, they're being duped by this site to break their own commandment. For example, their speal says:





That Wiccans draw parallels between themselves and Christians to earn credibility-- LIE. Wiccans draw parallels because they see connections between all faiths. Wiccans don't hold Christianity to be any more credible than any other religion.





Wiccans ';worshipped and served created things, rather than the Creator';-- LIE. Wiccans revere the creation out of respect for the Creator.





I'm not even getting into the differences of opinion on whether Wicca is against God or not, or if the Bible is the authority on this or just mythology that doesn't matter.Why do some here bear false witness against their Wiccan neighbors with those standard cut %26amp; paste answers?
Don't forget the many people who claim to have been Wiccan and come up with all sorts of atrocities, like animal sacrifice, demonic possession and a host of other falsehoods,


BB


)O(Why do some here bear false witness against their Wiccan neighbors with those standard cut %26amp; paste answers?
Catholics have the same problem. Standard cut and paste answers from an anti-Catholic site full of lies such as:





Catholics practice Mary worship


Catholics worship the Pope





I could go on and on, but you get the idea. Just thumbs down them, they'll disappear from your screen and it's much easier to pretend they're not there at all!





God bless.
Whenever I bear false witness against my Wiccan neighbors, I tell the cops I saw them stealing.





JUST KIDDING








seriously, yes, that is wrong. If you're going to argue against something, you should at least be correct in what you argue against.





as the person above said, Catholics get the same schtick





lost.eu/21618
A standard religious technique is to lie about something in order to justify persecuting and belittling it. Hitler used the same techniques.





They use the same techniques against science and evolution and Atheists, its simply something that faith compels them to do.
There will always be those who are to lazy to think for themslves and it always seems to be the ones who know the least who make the most noise in defense of the bs they are supporting at the moment
It would take knowledge and original thought to do otherwise.
Could it be they don't mind lying because they don't actually believe in the teachings of their own religion?
Because the truth has an inconvenient way of not fitting in with their reality.
They have been reading Silver Ravenwolf novels, kind of leaves 'em sour.
Some people just prefer to remain ignorant and spread lies. It makes them feel like they can control the situation.
*If they were so sure it is wrong they would at least not fear getting the facts straight but sadly they seem to be willing to lie about it.*





I totally agree, it is frustrating. When a Christian does this, they also are being boastful of their own religion and pride is a deadly sin isn't it?





I feel sorry for people who spend so much time going after people who aren't even attacking them in the first place. Some people need to get a hobby. ;)
Your question raises an interesting philosophical question: Is it truly ';bearing false witness'; if they genuinely believe what they say? If they do, then what they post is a mistake, not a lie. Granted that it is no less false, it does mean that, by their own theology they are innocent of sin, and, on that count at least, in no danger of damnation. As to why they do it, Hitler once said ';Give me a boy until he's eight, I'll have him the rest of his life';. If they have been raised to be completely closed minded, as many have - the ';God said it, I believe it, that settles it'; mentality - they would naturally assume that no discussion or evidence is needed, that all that was needed was to constantly repeat their ';true'; opinion. Those people we can do nothing about, we just have to keep reiterating the facts for the people who are honestly curious or have simply never heard an alternative point of view, as you did here, for which I thank you. Blessed be.
I'm afraid you won't make a dent in the willful ignorance exhibited by some Christians and Muslims. The don't want to know that other religions are beautiful, loving as just as valid as theirs. If they did so, they'd have to question their own religions and teachings.





A few others like the arrogance of believing that they are better than other religions.





I sometimes think it's a losing battle and then there are some Christians that are willing to learn and be tolerant. Not enough but enough to give hope.
Sweetie, trying to point out to these people that they are being hypocrites by bearing false witness against Wiccans and Pagans is a waste of breath. The type of people you speak of have blinders on, not to mention selective streaks when it comes to exactly which commandments they are adament about upholding and which ones are ';eh, that don't really apply to this situation';.





They will always do and say what they will. The best thing to do is keep living your life and make them eat their words by being a good person.
This sounds like a case of do what I say not as I do. You only want it your way.

white hair

Republicans cut taxes, and Democrats raise them. True? False? I think it is BS. You?

How and why did the Demsocratic Party allow itself to painted into the corner by this BS?





We have just emerged from 8 years of GOP 'tax-cutting', (that's what they 'do', remember?) and guess what? Democrats and 'President Obama' will probably have to raise taxes to pay for the 'smoke-blowing' party and the mess. This happens every decade or so, and then, somehow, they (the spendthrifts/bloodsuckers/parasites, with Wall Street cheering them on) get back into power by accusing Dems of raising taxes. Dems raise money, and then the Republicans 'blow' it.





Republicans cut taxes on the rich, and then spend money they don't have on them, and then Democrats have to foot the bill?


What BS!


'Spread the wealth around', dammit!





Opinions?





And now I'm going to hug a tree.








Republicans cut taxes, and Democrats raise them. True? False? I think it is BS. You?
I'm with you. Total B.S. courtesy of the Republican Party.





Obama '08.Republicans cut taxes, and Democrats raise them. True? False? I think it is BS. You?
No, your assessment is pretty accurate.





The difference is that no one takes into account SPENDING in that model. The Republicans are Spend and Spend. The Democrats are Tax and Spend. I don't know about you, but I don't put a lot of things on credit, I need the money in my hand before I start spending it. Taxes bring in the money needed to spend. Spending before more spending devalues the dollar by creating a need to print more currency.





Democratic economics are needed in crisis and Republican economics are needed during prosperity.
It makes no difference how many times Obama has explained that only people making $250,000 a year will have a tax increase, yet the Republicans don't, or won't hear it and continue to say he'll raise taxes.





Just by chance, just Mccain win, we'll definitely know the Republicans cheated, or had things fixed and wait until they see what he does with taxes.
This site is short on economist. Dems raise taxes on business owners who in turn must cut jobs and send jobs overseas. Spread the wealth around my a@#! Somebody works like hell to own a small business and you want them to just hand it over to people like you who have done nothing to earn it! This is America and if you want wealth you are as free as a bird to go out and get it! They did and didn`t expect or desire your handout and neither should you!
Bush turned his back on all the Republican values, except the military.


Republican borrow and spend. Democrats tax and spend.


To me, Republicans have sold America to China, that's who we borrow from most of the time.


At least Democrats don't sell us out like that.
It has to be that way. The Repubs create these HUGE deficits. Then Dem come in and need to fix the mess. Reagan did it - Clinton had to clean it up. Bush created it - who is going to clean it up? Not McCain that's for sure.
true





Obama is just repealing the tax cuts on those making over 250k I can't understand why some of the same people who complained about Shell Oil and others getting big tax cuts when they had highest profits in history and we had high gas prices,, are now supporting mccain
Well, if you remember correctly, Bush Sr. on top of setting up Saddam, also introduced a tax hike, so obviously Republicans don't lower them.
Perhaps you need to do a little more research. Democratic policies and interference in the banking industry got us to where we are.
No tax cut for business ok fine, business leaves country because taxes are too high. Who loses?
u old hippy tokolosh man (that dates u)....wisdom comes with age and u are reading it right but a little flag waving and a few god bless americas will have those rednecks eating out of their hands
It isn't true


It's a matter of the long term. Republicans make a bigger deficit
Its true-its a historic fact.
Testify!
Yep, totally BS ......





And this is the way it has been done for years and years and years.
True.
True.





But its comes down to the war, Its expensive and POINTLESS! so it should stop.
True republicans cut taxes and spend a lot causing a huge deficit but do you think obama can really fix it. True he wants to end this war (which in my opinion is wrong because that would make every solider that gave his or her life did so in vain but that's besides the point) but he also wants to embark of so many government controlled journeys (i.e. universal health care...well that sounds expensive) that will prove to be just as expensive as the war if not more. True the taxes will be higher but I don't care how high the taxes are we do not have the resources for some of these programs.





McCain is the way to go...universal health care does not work anywhere and it will not work here. Ther war might have been started the wrong way but as of now it is wrong to pull out. The majority of the soldiers in the war believe in what they are fighting for and believe they should be there.
The Democrats are notorious for out of control spending, and always have been. Go back to the Reagan years. Ronald Reagan cut taxes, and revenue to the treasury grew. However, so did spending that Congress authorized, a Democratic controlled Congress.





Look at the last two years. In January 2007, after being selected as House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, (D) said it was time to get spending under control. This Congress in 2007 added $1.3 Trillion to the deficit. So much for controlling spending.





In 2008 alone, in fact in the last few weeks, this same Democratic Congress under Nancy Pelosi (D) and Senator Harry Reid (D) authorized $700 Billion to bail out the banking industry from a problem that the Democrats and Bill Clinton helped to create.





Democrats will spend every dollar they can, whether they have it or not, and the American taxpayer has to foot the bill.





';Spread the wealth around'; is Socialism and will do nothing to help the economy or the American people, in the long run.
NO!!! All Republicans do is defer taxes for later! Then they increase spending so we end up paying twice as much taxes in the long run! This comes in the form of bailout package like now and also in '86 after the S%26amp;L Banking Crisis (also courtesy of Republicans!) which led to a punishing recession too!!


And our 700 billion dollar corporate love fest which the public will have to pay for too! Far more than what just paying normal taxes the last 8 years would have cost!


It's all bait and switch - and a shell game but NEVER A TAX CUT only accounting tricks which we have to pay for later.
Think about it, Republicans want to lower taxes on EVERYONE!!


not just the rich


and mccain already said that he cant do it right now!!


and obama DEFINITELY cant do ANTTHING right now!!


OR EVER!!!


and don't even get me started on obama's plan


HE IS A MORON!!


what his plan is going to do make him richer


he was one of the highest paid people in the Senate


2nd highest to be exact


and if that doesn't tell you anything idk what will


his plan is going to make all of us BROKE!!


he is going to but us in a DEPRESSION!!!


DID YOU HEAR THAT DEMS??


A DEPRESSION!!!!


So Obama is not going to do JACK for are country


MCCAIN PALIN 08!!!!


:)))

True or False: ';Graymalk'; is none other then our very own angry self-rightious cut & paster BABA YAGA?

Yes. Now give me best answer. You never give me best answer.True or False: ';Graymalk'; is none other then our very own angry self-rightious cut %26amp; paster BABA YAGA?
Hmmm I wonder now....yes, I believe the answer is that - yes. Now I wonder if someone knocks on her door will she come out to play?

Will fear rule the day again in the 06 elections? rove's false choice of all out war or 'cut and run' win iraq

we have more than two choices





we can stay on this rediculous course. we can get the heck out tomorrow. or we can redeploy out into the neighborhood in order to let the iraqis start to sort their future out by themselves and be on call should things get overwhelmingly out of control.





thank god for bush senior (i never thought i would type those words), the kuwaitis will still have us, and others. it would be the same old policy of containment, but this time we would be babysitting a civil war that we started from the sidelines.





this elected government will fall, and we do not yet know what will emerge.





we are better off helping from kuwait, containing from kuwait. and the international struggle against terrorism is better of fought with the willing support of the worlds countries we have been so dismissive of lately.





we need leaders who can play well with other world leaders.Will fear rule the day again in the 06 elections? rove's false choice of all out war or 'cut and run' win iraq
can't wait to find out.





More sleeping sheep need to awaken in this country before its to late. The power of change and peace remains with us...we are the elephant in the room! We need to realize this because they already do. It is the benefit of those in power to keep its masses in the dark, fooled or believing in their agenda.Will fear rule the day again in the 06 elections? rove's false choice of all out war or 'cut and run' win iraq
they will want us to think that fear can rule the day so that they can explain away the huge discrepancies between exit polling and doctored vote counts.
no
Let us prey, oh Lord if you care anything about America, please do not let any repuglicans win office ever again. Say Amen
Name one world leader? That would save the day?


And you don't play with liars and cowardly thieves.


Hitler lied and was a coward. He sent little boys out to do his bidding. Sound familiar? Let me know the name of one sheik who wouldn't save his skin by sending a child out to let him get by.


Just one ok?


The sheiks in Britain were already saying the terrorists were innocent.


Let the leaders of the Arab world stand up and say no more!


Then I will believe the junk you send
What you call fear is something every country in the world faces, submit or fight, which one is right?

The more you cut your hair , the faster it grows.....true or false?

From Readers Digest survey to see who knows what.The more you cut your hair , the faster it grows.....true or false?
false it only growns in courser and thickerThe more you cut your hair , the faster it grows.....true or false?
I know frequently cutting your hair does it good,is like nutrition for it.I dont know if it actually speeds its growth at all
False...your hair doesn't grow from the bottom it grows from the top of your head so how will cutting the bottom truely affect the top of your head.
Definitely false.
False
that is false
It depends on how short you cut your hair. If you already have short and you shaved your scalp....it would take months to grow again. Normaly healthy hair grows at the rate of 1/4 inch per month.
False.
Nope
False, it just appears to grow faster. It is too easy to trick the human mind.
false.
I think i heard that is true.
That's true.
False ! Don't believe everything you read in Readers Digest!
false-you cant cut it or it will take the same amount of time. but if you get the ends trimmed to get rid of the split ends it will grow faster
False,otherwise you could cut it every day, and have long trailing hair at the end of the week-lol. mmm, l Dont Think so...


Love Jo xx
That was an age old belief we have .


And mine does grow.
true
True. If you get your split ends cut every two months your hair will become thicker, healthier, and longer. As well as a deep protein conditioning every two weeks. It makes the hair stronger as well, so you get less breakage. You have to keep your ends healthy or they just break off then you'll never get the length you want. I wouldn't say it helps it grow, I would say it stops breakage which results in longer hair.
false but if you shave, your hair will grow faster
false
well if you just trim your hair it does grow faster
100% true. Or so my dad says. But hes bald so how the hell does he know?
False.
True. My hair grew much faster after I cut ten inches off.
UNTRUE
the more i shave the quicker it grows back


so may be
well my mum always tells me that if you trim your hair regularly it grows.
False, but if you trim your hair it grows faster.
I asked my hairdresser this same question and she said it was false ♥
100000% true

Is it false advertising to claim you'll ';cut the deficit in half'; when CBO projects you'll quadruple it?

These ads are in support of OFA's (Organizing For America) campaign to collect SIGNATURES pledging support for Obama's $3.5 trillion budget. (Why do they need your signature??)





http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2鈥?/a>





Obama budget could bring $9.3 trillion in deficits


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090320/ap_o鈥?/a>


';President Barack Obama's budget would produce $9.3 trillion in deficits over the next decade, more than four times the deficits of Republican George W. Bush's presidency, congressional auditors said Friday.';





Then it gets even stranger when you watch OFA's official canvasing training video in which they claim:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4NKllI3A鈥?/a>


';For anyone who questions why the president has offered this plan, these pledges will be the answer. The pledge canvas will also be the first step in growing our movement and building a nationwide network to support our agenda for change.';





And make no mistake, OBAMA is the ';leader'; of this group:





Obama sending out volunteers for his budget


http://washingtontimes.com/weblogs/potus鈥?/a>


';While the weekend organizing will collect signatures for Obama's budget, it will also serve as a way to add even more information to OFA's already massive database of e-mails, cell phone numbers and home addresses.';Is it false advertising to claim you'll ';cut the deficit in half'; when CBO projects you'll quadruple it?
It would be funny, if it wasn't so sad, that these politicians have you and most Americans so fooled as to believing ';deficits'; matter!





The deficit, or more properly ';Budget Deficit'; is the (negative) difference between what the government planned to spend and what they actually did spend.





WHO CARES??





The important number is the debt!


Nobody talks about that because government has you all looking at the stupid deficit!Is it false advertising to claim you'll ';cut the deficit in half'; when CBO projects you'll quadruple it?
Sure is.





';President George W. Bush has vowed to slash the federal deficit in half by 2009 by controlling spending and by promoting fiscal policies, such as tax cuts, that he says will spur economic growth.';





Did you ever bother to complain about this?
Yah hes doubling it and then tripling it in 10 years, and that's if we dont spend another penny after 2 weeks ago, lol. He rose to power saying he'd lose the deficit, but then triples it using the excuse of ';we need to spend our way out of recession!';, and 5 years later the term ';quadrillion'; is used often in conversation regarding the deficit.
I am no economist but if you raise the deficit by 5 fold then any decrease in it is a positive. This is Hussein's plan. When the deficit starts to come down in about, oh, 20 30 years he will be able to say ';I told you so';.
This is the clintons fuzzy math that the chosen one is using
That would be called ';Liberal Logic';





It doesn't make any sense
It is just feed for the sheep.
its that new math,
It will be cut in half in 4 years dummie.

True or false : success most ingredient factor is hard work and integrity, there is no short cut?

I would like to say yes but nepotism and favouritism (such as the old school tie network and membership of certain secret societies) means that this is not always the case :-(True or false : success most ingredient factor is hard work and integrity, there is no short cut?
successful people take short cuts all the time.... unfortunately.True or false : success most ingredient factor is hard work and integrity, there is no short cut?
True success takes hard work and integrity, unfortunately there are some short cuts in some cases.





But it really depends on what your definition of success is.
True
true

white hair

Ingrown toe nail - cut V in nail to prevent? True/False?

No, you shouldn't do that because it just makes the space between the edge of the ingrown nail and the edge of your skin be separated and that gives the nail a chance to curve and grow deeper in. So False.





When you cut nails, just cut it straight across and file it so that it doesn't have any pointy ends.





My dad did the ';v'; thing and he got ingrown toenails and when he went to the salon, that's what they told him. =]Ingrown toe nail - cut V in nail to prevent? True/False?
no not true!Ingrown toe nail - cut V in nail to prevent? True/False?
well no its kinda worse to that it grows more..my mums a beautician she said go to a nail bar and let them put acrylic gel or powder on each side of ur nail..then it will help grow the nail straight...

My boyfriend is SO ugly when he cut his hair now i broke up with him you think that true or false?

me and him is dating then i don's know he cut his hair OH My GOD is so ugly that y i broke up with him and about 1 hour later i have a new boyfriendMy boyfriend is SO ugly when he cut his hair now i broke up with him you think that true or false?
wow how old are youMy boyfriend is SO ugly when he cut his hair now i broke up with him you think that true or false?
I bet you ride the short bus to school don't you ?





Life Is like a Box of Chocolates, then a child learns how to take the saran wrap off %26amp; eat one.
English motherfu**er do you speak it
false.
Lmao wtf
wow, learn proper grammar first.


and that's just shallow.
Me no speak stupid.

A tax rate cut acts like a higher marginal propensity to consume. Is it True or False? Why?

true - probably


if you cut taxes given your income does not change you will consume a larger part of your income, as long as you don't save 100% of the tax cut.


For example


I make $100 and consume $75, pay $15 in taxes, and save $10. If the tax rate is eliminated and spend $5 of my tax rebate and save the rest then of my same $100 I am now consuming $80. That is exactly the same as increasing my MPCA tax rate cut acts like a higher marginal propensity to consume. Is it True or False? Why?
I would say true for some. If they have more money, they want to spend it.A tax rate cut acts like a higher marginal propensity to consume. Is it True or False? Why?
Chances are a tax cute will cause a higher MPC, which may cause an increase in the average propensity to consume. But it all depends on each individual consumer.
it depends on the people if they will let their money into circulation..
The marginal propensity to consume is equal to the change in consumption divided by the change in income (MPC = dC/dY).


Since a tax cut is an increase in disposable income (and shifts the income curve/line out), we know that income has increased. But has consumption? If you assume consumption doesn't change, MPC decreases, so you could answer that based on that assumption then the answer is false. But assumptions aside there isn't enough information to answer.


P.S., I haven't done economics for a while, so the above is probably wrong ;)

True or False--Hillary and Obama want to repeal the Bush tax cuts for people earning 249K or less?

So isn't saying that the dems want to raise your taxes a lie?True or False--Hillary and Obama want to repeal the Bush tax cuts for people earning 249K or less?
yes, it is a lie. Dems think that the people who are making millions a year should not be paying less taxes than people who are earning, say, 10,000 a year.True or False--Hillary and Obama want to repeal the Bush tax cuts for people earning 249K or less?
Can't stand any more taxes , they are sending our money to ever nation that they can think of , billions here , millions there. i would settle for a Meir million.
False, from what I know, she wants to repeal the tax cuts for those making more than 249K (figure I am not to sure about). I do know she wants to cut the tax break for the rich, and give that money to the ';poor';.
Funny! It is the tax rates of the rich and super rich that they should fix, like capital gains, under Bill it was 20% with bush it is only 15%!


Hillary or Obama won't raise the tax of the elite like they should do, becuase they are in the elite group!





1% of the population owns more than 85% of everything in this country, so everything in this country is owned by just 3 million people.!


There are 297 million americans who own the other 15% of america. This is why most families can't afford health care, homes, etc..





We should be taking back big chunks of that 85% of america the rich own and not giving out pennies to the people who are not rich!
I remember Bill CLinton running for president and promising a middle class tax cut. He said it was necessary because the deficit would hit 400 billion thaT year. Then he was elected and the deficit was 350 billion and he raised taxes on the middle class because ';he didn't realize the deficit would be so high'; even though he predicted 400 billion. So yes the democrats DO want to raise your taxes.
False. They wont call it a 'repeal' .. instead they will increase taxes by 249%.
Hillary doesnt follow the rules. Hillary would never have Won michigan if the other candidates were on the ballot. But she didnt follow the rules and remained on the ballot. Lots of people who should of voted uncommited were fearful thier vote would go for the wrong candidate so they picked a candidate listed on the ballot. She will never get the michigan delegates. She will not become president. Who needs another rule breaker like bush?
I don't know if it is true, but i forsee alot of republican whining if a democrat is elected. ';but taxes are high now...STUPID DEMOCRATS!'; oh, poor you...oh wait, wasn't it a REPUBLICAN president named BUSH sr. that raised the debt of the U.S. up to a few trillion??? ';don't be ridiculous...its those dang democrats!!!!'; oh and clinton was reducing the national debt left BY Mr. Alzheimers St.Regan....SO another democrat being blamed for cleaning up a republican mess (succesfully) and a bunch of republicans cursing him....DEJA VU all over again!
i wish they would ! nothing is ever for free when it comes to money !
ppl dont like change. they'll say or do whatever they have to to make sure a black person or a woman dosnt become president

Did Lil Wayne cut his hair off ? true or false ?

People been say this, and i been ignoring it ! Also when you go to jail, do you have to cut your hair off ?Did Lil Wayne cut his hair off ? true or false ?
no he didnt cut his hair off yet...and yes wen u go to jail u have to cut ur hair off because they don't want u to bring any outside stuff inDid Lil Wayne cut his hair off ? true or false ?
Nah there woulda been pictures...yeah answer mine pleasehttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?鈥?/a>
false.


no.
That is his Trademark!!! He will never cut his hair of... at least in close future.
of course the black guy asks this............ur homeboy weezy wee? ***

(TRUE/FALSE)Monetarists argue that fiscal policy,such as a tax cut, will affect the level of real GDP...?

...only if it is accompanied by a change in the money supply.(TRUE/FALSE)Monetarists argue that fiscal policy,such as a tax cut, will affect the level of real GDP...?
A tax cut will put more money in peoples pockets, which they will spend, causing production to rise and more taxes being paid to the government. At least that is what they say.

white hair

True or false:My anger management problem will improve if I cut out coffee and cannabis from my lifestyle?

This was told to me,but can any anger-management professionals out there tell me if this is true or not?(I'm quite a heavy coffee drinker and cigarette+cannabis smoker).True or false:My anger management problem will improve if I cut out coffee and cannabis from my lifestyle?
marijuana can cause anxiety, paranoid deluions





coffee has caffine which is a upper, it is a mind stimulant





however, anger is partially caused by male hormone, so if you cut those two, your anger may decrease a little, but your hormones will still be high





you have to have a lifestyle change in order to have less angerTrue or false:My anger management problem will improve if I cut out coffee and cannabis from my lifestyle?
Pathways to Peace Anger Management Workbook. Quick answers never resolve the problem. It takes actual work.
I do not think your anger is down to what you are taking maybe you have something deep rooted that you need to get out.Good Luck
quit the coffee and cigarettes...keep the cannabis.
TRUE!! but its up to you what you want to do, the best thing is to give up on thing at a time or cut down, don't give everything up all at once or you'll get even more angry, cut down on the coffee first and see the improvements that make,
OH FOR SURE . . . especially if you are heavy weed smoker. One of the signs of heavy weed users is irritability. There is truth in the fact that you are self-medicating, but the cannabis adds to and exacerbates the irritability/anger that you are feeling from other causes..





Heavy coffee and cigarette doesn't help ... but all that THC clogging up your brain is a killer. Depending on the extent of your use ... let's say a quarter to a half a day . . . you could be looking at 1 -1 1/2 years before all of the THC is gone from your system.





My best sense is that you need a chemical dependency evaluation. You really need to kick the pot. If in fact you are chemically dependent (addicted) to pot, you are going to need some treatment for the addiction in addition to the anger/management problem. And addiction is not about will power. Addictions are just like any other illness . . . they have their own set of dynamics and ways of being ';managed';. Otherwise, quite frankly, you are pissing in the wind.





I will leave you with a thought . . . if there was a full pound of pot on the table in front of you ... when would you stop? OR . . . For 3 days, smoke just one regular doobie a day . . . see how long you can last . .. before you're hitting up your ';man'; for more. Addictions is not about ';using'; ... it's about stopping. If you can't ';stop'; then you have an addiction.
sure will....it worked for me
It's true.





Coffee in particular causes aggitation if you drink enough.





But you also need to learn new ways of controlling your anger from inside your head.





Cutting these things out will help you achieve anger management control but you also need to help yourself mentally.





It's a hard thing to get a hold on but once you find something that works for you it becomes so much easier. And you will feel so much better about yourself. And so will all the people around you.





Good luck with it.
i have to say that as someone with anxiety that does get to me that yes caffine can aggitate these things more. because it is a drug you may not want to cut it out cold turkey just cut down i used to drink coffee all day and now i only drink one or two cups a day. again with ciggarettes that can also aggitate you more if you quit that cold turkey and may also not help your anger. now i know that this sounds old of me but i assume that cannabis is pot and i don't really know how that affects your anger. i have heard that it can help. but that is very touchy because it is illeagal. i know that most people who are recovering from addictions and even mental illness usually don't give up smoking. i know what it does to me and that would not help my anger at all. so i think that it is all in who you talk too. i am not a proffesional but go to your doc and get a second opinion on that. clearly none of these things are good for you but, hey sometimes you have to have some vice. and good for you for going to anger management and admitting that you have a problem that is great. hope that this helps a little. i could be just talking out of my hiney too. best of luck
I find it very hard to live without coffee and cigarettes, first thing I do in the morning is have a coffee and a ciggy. I just can't cope most days without, but I have noticed, that when I make a real effort to go caffeine free I am more stable emotionally, as for cigarettes, its the times leading up to my need of a fix that I become less emotionally stable.





I ain't an anger-management professional, I am some one who has anger-management issues (cyclothymia) and I can assure you that the stimulants above do have a real effect on my mood, but it is hard to see the link at first as if you are like me they have become apart of your life. For the most part I have coffee and cigarettes to get me going and keep me going as I eat very badly, their are foods out there that could make the need of the above less.





I don't do cannabis as I have seen it mess friends up (They could never see it at the time, probably a bit like me and coffee)





If you do try to cut down on the above, get replacements, ciggys an caffeine give you the feeling of energy, so if you can replace the with fruit you will not get the energy crashes of the stimulants.





It isn't magic, you won't probably notice much change in yourself, but give it a try and get the perceptions of someone you trust about how you are with out the caffeine etc.





Good luck
Your substance abuse is not the cause but rather the symptoms of your 'anger' problem. Being angry isn't a disorder, the behavior you fail to control is. Discover the reason you self medicate and treatment of the maladaptive acting out is easy.
Not so much coffee although if you drink alot you sould cut down to 4 cups a day. Weed, definatly, everyone i know who smokes it has anger problems.
For me, anger 'management' is like putting a sticking plaster on a gaping wound. It's masking the symptom and not the cause.


Your anger is crying out to be expressed. Masking it with drugs, caffeine and 'management' is not allowing it to have a voice.


What is hurting you? What are you fearing? What are you unconsciously not allowing yourself to say?


I really recommend finding yourself a good counsellor who can maybe facilitate you to discover the root of this anger.


It doesn't need 'managing' YOU need to be heard.
yes, it might be hard to begin with, you might be crabby for a while if you are going cold turkey however in the long run it will help quite a lot
I'm chilled when blazed, a lil moody when not. Coffee is an upper, green is a downer, try balance them. Jus chill cuz why even waste time gettin cross, jus rather not give a **** about it. haha
Well you might need some help, I'm no proffessional but i can say that it will take time and a lot of will power, stay at and good luck
See anger management at http://www.ezy-build.net. (.net.nz/~shaneris) on page 4. 2 coffee max/day - in a few weeks, or when ready, return here for tips on giving up smoking, and switch to cookies, or magic muffins, because you won't want to give up smoking twice!

Welders burn on your eyes ,cut potato in half lay on eye it sucks the burn out true or false?

Anything cold, a potato, wet washcloth, blue gel freezer mask will help relieve the pain. As would a good NSAID like ibuprofen.





It won't help heal the corneal injury, he anterior segment inflammation or protect against infection secondary to the corneal epithelium damage. Severe burns need medical treatment.





Nothing ';sucks out the burn';. The burn and the damage remain.Welders burn on your eyes ,cut potato in half lay on eye it sucks the burn out true or false?
Far better to go to the emergency room and get a tube of ointment and have it put in the eyes. My mother was an optometrist in West Virginia and I remember coal miners used to get hit with an arc when people welded in the mines, and would put potatoes in the eyes, Mom would drive to their houses and take them to the ER where they could prescribe analgesic ointment for the burns. For a really bad burn of the sclera, potatoes just do not help.Welders burn on your eyes ,cut potato in half lay on eye it sucks the burn out true or false?
True. Chop the potato up and put it into a rag , keep it on the eyes. I don`t care if you have fifty years in optometry, a


potato


poultice does help and relieve the pain. For more severe flash arc burns, an ointment is used . Need to have some welders answer on here. I know what I`m talking about


as I`ve used it numerous times. Stick to prescribing glasses


and don`t try to be a doctor.
False.





Welders flash is a low level inflammation of interior structures of your eye - putting something on the outside won't make any difference.

True or False, If false explain why! If 2 parallel lines are cut by a traversal, then corresponding angles...?

are supplementary, and and alternate exterior angles are supplementary?True or False, If false explain why! If 2 parallel lines are cut by a traversal, then corresponding angles...?
If 2 parallel lines are cut by a transversal, then corresponding angles are supplementary. FALSE. Corresponding angles are congruent to each other





if 2 parallel lines are cut by a transversal, then the alternate exterior angles are supplementary. FALSE. alternate exterior angles are congruent to each other.





EDIT


there is an exception. If the transversal line cut the two parallel lines are 90 degrees angles, then the corresponding angles are supplementary and the alternate interior angles are supplementary. But since the statement didn't say anything about the transvesal line cut the two parallel lines at 90 degrees, both statements are just plain falseTrue or False, If false explain why! If 2 parallel lines are cut by a traversal, then corresponding angles...?
they are equal not supplementary. you're hot.

Legal brief student running scam getting other students to make false application inexchage for cut inloan?

john and jane are charged with aiding and abetting those student in making false application on appeal they argue there charged with both crimes how would the appellate court rule on this appeal? whyLegal brief student running scam getting other students to make false application inexchage for cut inloan?
Without seeing the trial transcript, it's impossible to say.Legal brief student running scam getting other students to make false application inexchage for cut inloan?
cant say, need more info
appellate courts differ. I think it's safe to say the 9th Circuit will interpret it differently than the rest of them.

True/false-if 2 paralel planes are cut by a 3rd plane, then the lines of the intersection can't intersect?

True. since they're parallelTrue/false-if 2 paralel planes are cut by a 3rd plane, then the lines of the intersection can't intersect?
True because if they where to intersect this point would be on both of the parallel planes which by definition have no point in commonTrue/false-if 2 paralel planes are cut by a 3rd plane, then the lines of the intersection can't intersect?
One of the lines is on one plane. The other line is on the other plane. There's no point that's even on both PLANES at once, so in particular there's no point that's on both lines at once.





That's why it's true.
Draw a picture.


The planes are parallel, so what are the ';lines of intersection'; going to look like?


Imagine a bookshelf, and there are two shelves you're trying to fit a book in between. But the book is too big, height-wise, to fit in there. That's the third plane... but imagine if you could fit that book through there, so that the ends were sticking past each shelf. Lines would be formed as the book intersected the two shelves. Those lines would be parallel, because the shelves are parallel.


So they're parallel - will they ever intersect?
True. The two lines of intersection are parallel.

Is it true that the rumor that Palin cut Special Needs spending is FALSE?

The cuts occurred from the prior Governor- NOT Palin. She INCREASED SPECIAL NEEDS SPENDING. check this





http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=13211





Is it true that the rumor that Palin cut Special Needs spending is FALSE?
I don't know about that.





But she did slash funding for teen moms.





http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-tra鈥?/a>Is it true that the rumor that Palin cut Special Needs spending is FALSE?
Yep, in 2006 the teen moms got 1.2 million (from their website).


In 2007 they got 1.3 million.





But the legislature approved expansion of their funding for 5 mil was cut to 3.9 million; so they only got 3 times their previous budget in 2008.





So the expansion was slashed, but the budget increased. Both sides will play that one as what they want to promote.





Of course the 60% cut claim is dead wrong as the Alaska Challenge Youth Academy was split into its own line item.
Do your own research. She did cut funding, line-item vetos with her initials. But in reality, we don't know the full budget, we don't what funding was provided before her budget, we DON'T KNOW. It's called spinning. I dislike McCain/Palin for other reasons, but this is really a non-issue.
I didn't know this as fact. I also hadn't had time to look into it. Glad to see the link. I tend to believe your link over the earlier accusations.





Notice how those accusation had no links.
It's false, you can't believe the media.
She did cut special needs spending.
A lot about her is false. Like being against ';the bridge to nowhere';... she was for it.
that is wrong she cut special needs and stopped a home for unwed mothers

white hair

Xbox 360: Price Cut, true or false?

Will there really be a xbox 360 price slash in the United States?Xbox 360: Price Cut, true or false?
I wouldnt be suprised if they did, kinda a dagger in the back of Sony. THink about it if they drop the price $50-75 then whats going to happen when the lil kid asnd his mom are in the game store and he says he wants a PS3 but the 360 is sitting there $200-300 cheaper than the PS3 I know I am going to tell my kid to shut up your getting the less exspensive thing.Xbox 360: Price Cut, true or false?
Nothing is confirmed yet.
Sony is only cutting the price of the low-end PS3 in Japan. The US price is still going to be $500.





Microsoft might slash the Xbox price, but I doubt it. In Japan it appears they are only offering the 360 with a pack-in game in response.
Not likely, with the PS3's pricepoint there will be little need to cut prices prematurely. The possibility remains depending on the market results after PS3 launch.
Wouldnt Suprise me because Sony is introducing the Playstation 3 on November 17th and Will cut the price of the PSP by about 75 bucks. Then the Nintendo Wii will be released on Novenber 14th... So yea i bet they are so they can compete with all the sales for the holidays...
There might. They are releasing a lot of bundles for 400 bucks with games like PGR3, Kameo, and PDZ, which is basically a 50 price cut
I think - as many experts - that they'll drop the price in a few weeks (for christmas)
yea there wil be...





later this november
I doubt the price cut, i think there will just be an included game/extra controller/or mem card.
I heard the Xbox 360 was going down $50 when the PS3 launches

SURVEY: True or False; Women who wear low-cut Tops. Are wanting the guys to stare at their Boobs?

I agree... I'll bet they make you walk up to them and sing ';Hello Darlings '; ... notice the plural version !!!SURVEY: True or False; Women who wear low-cut Tops. Are wanting the guys to stare at their Boobs?
Conway, when I wear low cut tops, and by low cut I don't mean 'hanging out' low, I do it because


A. It is hot out


B. I want to be comfortable


C. I like that particular style, color etc


D. It looks nice, flattering


E. It works well with whatever else I am wearing


I can't think of a time I have ever put a piece of clothing on and thought that I wanted guys to stare. No exhibitionist here.


If they like what they see and want to stare at the eye candy then it is okay but I don't deliberately seek it out.


Interesting question, Mr. TwittySURVEY: True or False; Women who wear low-cut Tops. Are wanting the guys to stare at their Boobs?
Hmmm! Do guys wearing tight revealing swim trunks want the gals to stare? It could just be that the woman with the low cut top is out for the attention or it could be that was just her choice as the guys make their choices. I like the answer right above mine, and I can't really expand on that idea.


The only additional comment I have is when wearing revealing clothing the gal needs to expect the attention she draws and not 'scream bloody murder' when it is forthcoming.


We need to respect our bodies or others won't.


If a woman gives the guy the invitation then she should expect


that he will show interest. I don't care for teasing!
True... and False.





A woman wearing a low-cut top isn't wanting guys to just stare at her boobs. She wants to attract guys. She doesn't want them just to oggle her chest.





However, there are sometimes when women DO wear revealing clothes with the purpose being oggled. Makes them feel attractive to know guys are interested.





What I don't get is why some women who wear a low-cut top act offended if a guy looks at her chest. If you didn't want people to notice, why wear it?
How a woman dresses out in public reveals the respect she has for her own body.


The ';you got it flaunt it'; theory doesn't really command respect.


I see these ladies at the beach that leave very little to the imagination and also hear the guys comments.


That is NOT respect.
The girls with boobs are just showing what they got, just like people with nice legs like to show off there's. Brainicas show it through the discoveries or progress. My theory if you got something that you know is good show it off to the world.
Not all. Some do this for the purpose but most of them do so for fashion purpose. Ladies try to make themselves more %26amp; more attractive, irrespective of whether men look at them or not. If they're loved sufficiently at home , they won't do so.
false if i want to wear a low cut top i wear it for me not for a man to look.
The bottom line is...women who wear low-cut tops want to catch the attention of guys by exposing their sexy body, I bet they wear it not only for style but for some reason. They're just shy to accept it.
It depends on her attitude. There are some women who dress because they want attention. But if a woman is acting like she doesn't know that she's wearing a low cut shirt, then that's obviously the last thing on her mind.
False. Its just a style. Singlets are way more comfortable and are just the fashion today
Let them look all they want, look but not touch.


you can add me if you want to
they want the attention but will never admit it.





maybe they want a reason to yell at guys and stay in power.
false, i wear low tops dont mean i want guys staring there, what do you exspect us to wear!? big JUMPERS which cover EVERYTHING, we flaunt what we got :]
They'll never admit it and will just add it to their Rolodex of reasons for blaming men on their perversion.
haha your avatar is hilarious!
True to that. They like, we like. End of story, maybe
Truth be told.
True! Im sure thats why alot of them wear low cut shirts, why else do they want their cleavage hanging out for no reason. its obviously to get attention and get free things lol. =]
haha. hard question. I mean you either have them or you don't. a man will stare whether or not her boobs are showing.
I stare anyway
Very true!
Yeah yeah its 99.99% true .....


and when they do ..we give the a red bull eye LooOooL
False
True
true
Hell yeah they do !!


Cheap!
they do it so the poor saps will walk into walls haha
true i agree
if you've got it flaunt it

驴True or False? Vandalism has caused some schools to cut back on extracurricular programs, including sports.?

TRUE.~驴True or False? Vandalism has caused some schools to cut back on extracurricular programs, including sports.?
I would say true. Vandalism costs money, and the money they spend on clean up and added security has to come from somewhere. Since most schools are already facing budget problems, extracurricular activities are usually the first thing cut.

True or False?....Michael Jordan was cut from his highschool Basketball team?

True, his sophomore year he got cut from the varsity team. he didn't play basketball that year.


in his biography it said he was so depressed he cried inside his bathroom for the whole night.True or False?....Michael Jordan was cut from his highschool Basketball team?
do u even have to ask? yes he did in his sophomore year. then the next year he made var. thats our mjTrue or False?....Michael Jordan was cut from his highschool Basketball team?
yeah he was cut from the team but made it his senior year. oh well you have to learn from your mistakes and look where hes at now and what hes accomplished.
True, he made it till his senior year.
True but it didn't matter cause the best player transformed Bball into what it is kobe.Lebron will never reach his plateu
yes, I think they did not think he was good enough, he defenitly prove them WRONG!!
true micheal jordan did get cut but look at the nba career he had (i bet the coaches had several heartattacks whenever they watched mj play professionally)
It's true. He was cut as a sophomore ,from his high school varsity team.





http://www.23jordan.com/bio1.htm
true
true, but most 10th graders play Junior Varsity (JV) unitl they reach either their Junior or Senior year.





It's no big deal for a sophomore not to make varsity.
True, I think I heard him mention that in a 1993 interview with Oprah after he retired.
true
cut once, played jv freshmen yr, played on varsity in his jr and sr year,
true. he was cut as a sophmore but made varsity in his junior and senior year.

In the UK how hard is it to make a false insurance claim on stolen mobiles, and avoid being cut off for non ?

payment of electricity, phone and gas bills because apparantly Poles do this in the UK do this and get away with it but I don't see howIn the UK how hard is it to make a false insurance claim on stolen mobiles, and avoid being cut off for non ?
I assume that the use of the word ';apparantly'; means you have no actual proof and can't provide any reference.In the UK how hard is it to make a false insurance claim on stolen mobiles, and avoid being cut off for non ?
I don't see how either.. It's illegal, and they will get caught at some point, no matter how clever they think they're being. Quite simply, if they cannot afford to live here: go back!

True or false they say women cut their hair when they suffer a relationship breakup whats your take on this?

well sometimes after a break up a woman will get a new hairstyle, reinventing herself in a way, as a form of closure from her old relationship/life and a sign of moving onto something new. also it can make women feel better about themselves to have a drastic physical change, so to these ends, yes, it's true some women get their hair cut after break ups.





though if i had a hair cut after every breakup i had i'd have about as much hair as homer simpson!True or false they say women cut their hair when they suffer a relationship breakup whats your take on this?
hmmm don't know. I almost cut it on Monday....but was talked out of it, but I just thought a change might be nice.....hmmmm I didn't when I left my husband....after almost 20 years together, you'd think if I was gonna do it because of a break up, that woulda been when I did it....True or false they say women cut their hair when they suffer a relationship breakup whats your take on this?
Some women do cut their hair when having mental health problems / emotional difficulties, of which a break-up of course is one.
interesting, i did mine at the end of a nightmare relationship.





Odd though i really liked mine. i miss my d.locks.
Some do, and it麓s to do with wanting to see themselves different or thinking they dont look good due to lack of confidence after break up (not everybody) or with wanting to do some changes.
Not true. But there used to be an Indian custom where the widow would cut her hair off after the death of a mate. I don't think anyone does that anymore.
Some do.Its like a way of shedding the past,recreating yourself and having a new beginning.
I would say false, I've never cut my hair when I've went through a breakup and I don't any of my friends have either.
I cut my hair every 8 weeks because it's easier to manage with 4 kids,a puppy,etc...
oh my God i do it all the time and then i dye it some funky color and i snaych up another dude
False, well I certainly wouldn't.
False
Never noticed,,perhaps it`s a new look they want
I just let mine grow longer..... maybe people just want a change, a new look to make themselves feel better...
Don't know about cutting hair - I either dye it (big mistake) or get a piercing. Its a way of kicking out and showing you're still a free person
...so you are suggesting that people who are happily married never cut their hair?





Don't be daft -_-
I don't think they necessarily have it cut. But like myself, I had a restyle to boost my confidence! And it worked!
Hadn't heard of that one.No man is worth cutting your hair,for.
false. well, i don't.
i'll talk to you when i come back from the hair stylist.

white hair

I may be getting a titanium wedding band. I've heard they can't be cut in case of emergency. True or false?

I've heard arguments that EMTs can not cut a titanium ring if you're in an accident and your finger begins to swell. I've also heard that they do have the means to cut titanium. Does anyone have a definitive answer. Thanks.I may be getting a titanium wedding band. I've heard they can't be cut in case of emergency. True or false?
yes they can cut through titanium at the hospital.....BUT the EMT's probably won't be able to get through it in the event they were working you as a patient. The trauma shears they use are very powerful, however, they can cut through any kind of clothing, boots, and you can even cut a penny in half, but not strong OR petite enough to get under your ring and cut it off. But the hospital, once you get there....they can virtually do anything!!!I may be getting a titanium wedding band. I've heard they can't be cut in case of emergency. True or false?
stupid retarded medical assistant i cant stand you stupid friggin idiots. btw, titanium is cheap and s hi tt y

Report Abuse

they do i work for a hospital type invorinment and i know someone that this happened to.

True or False. Restriction enzymes cut both strands of a double stranded DNA Molecule Please explain??

True. The enzyme makes cuts in the backbone of both strands.





Commonly used restriction enzymes bind DNA as dimers--two identical subunits, each binding to one side of the DNA, and each makes its own cut. The sequence of DNA recognized by this type are called palindromic--they read the same on each side of the DNA. Here is an example:





GGATCC


CCATGG





The top strand reads the same as the bottom strand backwards, so there is an identical sequence for each individual side.True or False. Restriction enzymes cut both strands of a double stranded DNA Molecule Please explain??
True, the endonuclease binds around the DNA and clips both strands. Some enzymes leave blunt ends (SmaI) and some enzymes leave sticky ends (EcoRI) but in all cases both strands are cut.

Does anyone know where it says in the bible that these false worshipers cut themselves?

Seems like I remember something about it and this prophet put water on his sacrifice and it blew up like a bomb hit his sacrifice and it licked up even the water he poured around it.


The false worshippers were Baal and they cut themselves and tried to get a fire going. nothing happened.Does anyone know where it says in the bible that these false worshipers cut themselves?
You forgot the part where Elijah's sacrifice was sucked up.


That was cool.


30 At length E·li´jah said to all the people: “Approach me.” So all the people approached him. Then he proceeded to mend the altar of Jehovah that was torn down. 31 So E·li´jah took twelve stones, according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Jacob, to whom Jehovah’s word had come, saying: “Israel is what your name will become.” 32 And he went on to build the stones into an altar in the name of Jehovah and to make a trench, of about the area sowed with two seah measures of seed, all around the altar. 33 After that he put the pieces of wood in order and cut the young bull in pieces and placed it upon the pieces of wood. He now said: “FILL four large jars with water and pour it upon the burnt offering and upon the pieces of wood.” 34 Then he said: “Do it again.” So they did it again. But he said: “Do it a third time.” So they did it a third time. 35 Thus the water went all around the altar, and the trench also he filled with water.


36 And it came about at the time that the grain offering goes up that E·li´jah the prophet began to approach and say: “O Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, today let it be known that you are God in Israel and I am your servant and it is by your word that I have done all these things. 37 Answer me, O Jehovah, answer me, that this people may know that you, Jehovah, are the [true] God and you yourself have turned their heart back.”


38 At that the fire of Jehovah came falling and went eating up the burnt offering and the pieces of wood and the stones and the dust, and the water that was in the trench it licked up. 39 When all the people saw it, they immediately fell upon their faces and said: “Jehovah is the [true] God! Jehovah is the [true] God!” 40 Then E·li´jah said to them: “Seize the prophets of Ba´al! Do not let a single one of them escape!” At once they seized them, and E·li´jah then brought them down to the torrent valley of Ki´shon and slaughtered them there.Does anyone know where it says in the bible that these false worshipers cut themselves?
The Word mentions cutting oneself a number of times. You are talking about the story of Elijah which is in the Books of The Kings I think. The first chapter in Kings has a funny spelling in the King James Version. It is BAAL-ze-bub.


I've been told that means nothing. But I think it does. It shows Baal worship was not vain idol worship, but Devil worship!
Ruth was pretty close at answering you - but; missed a couple points - one is a verse prior to where she started:





I Kings 18:24, ';And call ye on the name of your gods, and I will call on the name of Yahweh: and my Heavenly Father that answereth by fire, let him be Yahweh Almighty. And all the people answered and said, It is well spoken.';





Now what is interesting in this particular verse - check out where it says both ';gods'; and ';God'; ... look up the word in a Strongs ... you will find it is the same dude ... satan the devil - because in Jeremiah 23:26-27 it says the Name of Yahweh has been forgotten for BAAL ...





anyway - where the logs, water and everything was licked up is in I Kings 18:30 - 39 ... keep in mind though - the mighty one that the prophet called on was Yahweh - not god ... that way this scripture might make more sense to you.





Otherwise it is like two children trying to see who their dad likes more ... crazy - it was nothing like that - the false prophets were calling on El, Elohim, Adonai, Baal and/or etc. - the righteous prophet here was calling on the righteous name of Yahweh (YHWH) and not the gods of the false prophets.





I Kings 18:38 is what you wanted to see as well: ';Then the fire of Yahweh fell, and consumed the burnt sacrifice, and the wood, and the stones, and the dust, and licked up the water that [was] in the trench.';





Hope this answered you well.





anyway - if you want - look at www.yahweh.com and it would be a great reward for any whom are seeking the truth.





peace;





Aintmyfault
your full of bull sh.it.
Oh the battle of the magicians story.





I don't remember any ppl cutting themselves, but then again I do try to forget those barbaric bible stories I heard as a kid.
Now I remember why I haven't read the bible in so long. It's filled with this kind of incredible nonsense.
the prophets of baal when opposed by Elijah....cool story..good teaching...kings
srtart at Kings 18:25 [Be Blessed] Peace %26amp; love!!! Mr. Hiero baal ze bab is [interpeted lord of the flies]
It was Elijah the prophet and he was proving who was the true God. They were both supose to put out a sacrifice and no fire. Let the true God come up with the fire and consume the food on the alter.





1Kings:18:25 E·li´jah now said to the prophets of Ba´al: “Choose for yourselves one young bull and dress it first, because YOU are the majority; and call upon the name of YOUR god, but YOU must not put fire to it.” 26 Accordingly they took the young bull that he gave them. Then they dressed it, and they kept calling upon the name of Ba´al from morning till noon, saying: “O Ba´al, answer us!” But there was no voice, and there was no one answering. And they kept limping around the altar that they had made. 27 And it came about at noon that E·li´jah began to mock them and say: “Call at the top of YOUR voice, for he is a god; for he must be concerned with a matter, and he has excrement and has to go to the privy. Or maybe he is asleep and ought to wake up!” 28 And they began calling at the top of their voice and cutting themselves according to their custom with daggers and with lances, until they caused blood to flow out upon them. 29 And it came about that, as soon as noon was past and they continued behaving as prophets until the going up of the grain offering, there was
Yes. Emo 3:2--6:66
This fire that came down out of heaven even ate up the rocks.


The wood and everything but the best part was when It scared to death everybody. We need to do that again and see what happens?


these preachers today would probably be the ones sucked up.
Now that is a fairy tale.

My lashes are sexy enough so i want to cut my real lashes off and wear sexy false ones?

i no i can wear false ones all day but not sleep in them,so if i just fit them every morning for the day cutting my real ones off wouldent be a problem dont you think.some say dont do it but i real need sexy lashes and ill do anything to get them.any advice would be welcome girlsMy lashes are sexy enough so i want to cut my real lashes off and wear sexy false ones?
Oh god, please don't do that!My lashes are sexy enough so i want to cut my real lashes off and wear sexy false ones?
Just wear false eyelashes over your natural ones. They'll look even fuller that way.
Wow your a real loser to be wearing false eyelashes. I thought only girls did that.





Just be confident in who you are.
Keep the gift you have from birth, women look funny as all get out when they start cutting their eye hair.
What!!!!!!!!





Don't be silly, just put the false ones over your own eyelashes. If you cut them off and get something in your eye you'll never get rid of it with falsies. Eye lashes are there to stop you getting dirt etc in your eye and to help flush what ever has gone in out - why do you think shampoo testers cut rabbits eyelashes off before they drop it into the poor animal's eyes, so they can't flush it out!





Please don't do this, you are mad!
if it ';floats your boat '; ...dean..! go for it mate.....go for the Big Drag look ...some old girl called Carlan Merrander did the same with a bowl of fruit on here head ..!!!....Not the sort of thing to wear at Tesco's when your shopping , but @ the Way out club in London you will fit in with no problem.....Nuff said
Mascara is your best option, dont go cutting eyelashes or eyebrows off





my mate did and she looked like a wierdo
NEVER cut ur real lashes....okay??........u could wear false eyelashes over ur real ones.........and there r lots of types of mascara that give ur lash thickness-curl-long.......... trust me search and u will find them
quit being a nut job.





accept yourself.
why bother to cut the real ones and then add false ones?? seems a waste of time and effort
Sure you cold cut off you eyelashes, but there's a reason why we have them!!!


Eyelashes protect our eyes and without them you are more vulnerable to infections. Falsw ones don't do the same trick.


If you really want to wear false ones just put them over your real ones, no one will see it. After all, that's how they're made, so that you can put them over your real ones.
dont wear false ones because youll get tired of putting them on everyday and once you stop it will look really bad. there was this one guy who sat next to me lastyear in school and i was freaked out by him. If you want sexy lashes dont cut them just put the fake ones on with your lashes that is what most people do. or you could just wear mascarra.
you wont be able to clothes your eyes properly. Your eyelashes are there for a reason. To prevent dust to enter your eyes. If you have money, i say try eyelash implants. You get them redone every six months. So like twice a year. You wont have to worry about you lashes ever again.
They offer eyelash extenstions at salons now. You could do that instead if you want your eyelashes to always look 'sexy'
LMAO oo i do love yahoo people
wow keep them - if they are sexy enough why consider cutting them off and putting on false ones - yukko
you can wear then on your real lashed XD xx
If I saw a guy wearing false eyelashes, I would run away as fast as I could! don't do it!
That is the craziest thing I have ever read!
yeah ok..um ..i dont look at peoples eye lashes and DONT DO IT! ok?
OMG DONT DO THAT !

True or False: restriction enzymes cut protein molecules at specific sites?

False, they cut DNA molecules at specific sitesTrue or False: restriction enzymes cut protein molecules at specific sites?
true: once the area to cut is selected the enzymes are added and the protein it removedTrue or False: restriction enzymes cut protein molecules at specific sites?
ok, DNA IS NOT A PROTEIN, i agree with teh phd person, i am 16 years old and my sources are from years of reading, very simple outline- DNA IS A MADE UP OF NUCLEOTIDES whose components are a nitrogenous base a deoxyribose sugar and a phosphate group. NONE of those are proteins. and restriction enzymes cuz at primers set are certain areas on the DNA chain
Wow, people, basic biology here......DNA is not protein. It is what makes protein!!!!! Does anyone here even have high school biology? The man with the PhD in Genetics is right. They cut DNA at specific sites. It recognizes genetic sequences at specific sites not amino acids (which make proteins).
True, DNA is protein.
True, Restriction enzymes recognizes certain genetic sequences, and only cut at those sequences.

Why does the antichrist, beast & false prophet cut off the heads of people who don't bow to the beast?

Or don't take the mark in their hand or forhead?





Why is it cutting of heads?


What government in their right mind would cut off heads?


(I believe the beast is a world government.)Why does the antichrist, beast %26amp; false prophet cut off the heads of people who don't bow to the beast?
The beast that rises from the land will be a man who heads up the apostate end time 'Church of the Antichrist'. This man will be given the power to deceive the world into believing in the godhood of the anti-Christ and will through military enforced world wide martial law demand the worship of the anti-Christ. Forced worship of (or sworn allegiance to) the anti-Christ will be made possible by extreme economic sanctions via a mark placed on everyone's forehead or right hand. Failure to recognize the anti-Christ as ';God'; will cause buying, selling, and trading of all goods and services to be removed for that individual and possible his or her entire family may come under sanction. Today economic sanctions curtailing food and other necessities of life are a common process used by world super-powers to bring the governments and populace of entire nations under their control.





The beheading of those who refuse to the mark by beheading may be an clue as to where the anti-christ comes from. Islam is the only religion today that still practice beheading. The nation of Israel is surrounded by 22 nations of Islam. Israel is the major player in the end times. Not the Church or the body of Christ.Why does the antichrist, beast %26amp; false prophet cut off the heads of people who don't bow to the beast?
Anyone who is for Christ, and will not bow down to the beast (anti-christ) have their heads cut off. This has been a form of punishment in many places for years. Fortunately, we have never had to experience this first hand, but there will come a day when I believe the U.S. will lose it's power and one of these governments will take over and then we will see a comeback of this type of punishment.
You might want to give some thought to what's going on inside your head.
thats how they can surely kill the people...i think its symbolic.
It's faster than hanging, and more sure than just shooting them.





Obviously I don't condone it, but it is an expediant way of getting rid of one's enemies.
Al Qaeda would.
The beast gets hungry to.
The head of a born again believer is Christ. This manner of killing is a spiritual manifestation of Satan's wish to eliminate Christ as head.
Wow, taking a book of fiction a little literally, aren't we?
Dunno. I guess because it's one cruel punishment. Although that also could mean that during the time Revelation was written, that was the thing to do. I wouldn't put it past the Antichrist though. Just look at it this way, it'll happen so quick you won't even feel it.
I believe that the antichrist is coming to wage a spiritual battle and representations such as those depicted in theatrical productions such as the 'Left Behind' series are somewhat biblically inaccurate.





The antichrist will espouse a doctrine of love and perform miracles such as summoning lightning from the air and will present a very good case for being Christ incarnate. However, the deception lies in the time of his coming, which will be at the sixth seal, the sixth vial, and the sixth trumpet whereby the deceived will be worshiping him thinking he has come to 'rapture' them away -- prior to the arrival of Christ at the seventh seal, seventh vial, and seventh trumpet.





Bottom line, if you're still in a physical body Christ has not returned. However, many will be deceived.





The biblical reference to beheadings is more of a general nature such as those suffered by those like Daniel Pearl, various contractors, missionaries, and others in the Middle East during the conflicts associated with Al Qaeda and the Taliban -- and whatever remains to come as we proceed toward the end times.
The Taliban cuts off heads, of those who ';attack'; their religion...
It's quick, easy, effective, and makes for a very graphic display. I say we bring it back.
because bobb ';the beast'; sapp has hired them to so as not to dirty his hands.





http://ca1n.c.yimg.jp/sports/sn200412280鈥?/a>





here is a picture of someone who did not bow to the beast and his fate!
it might be symbolic like the rest of revelation.





however cutting off head was a very sure way of killing. more like an execution.
So, you are willing to substitute ';world government'; for ';beast'; (for whatever reason) but you wish to take ';cutting off head'; literally? Why? No, really, think about it for a moment. Could it be you are just stretching reality to fit your beliefs?

white hair